Connect with us

Politics

Fuel Subsidy Removal And Real Burden Bearers, By Pius Ashima

Published

on

“When the rain falls heavily, it is the poor man’s roof that leaks first.” This old African proverb speaks directly to the reality many Nigerians face today. Economic policies may be designed in government offices and defended by experts on television, but their true impact is felt in homes, markets, classrooms, hospitals, and on the streets where ordinary people struggle daily to make ends meet.

Few government policies in recent years have generated as much debate, concern, and controversy as the removal of fuel subsidy. Since President Bola Ahmed Tinubu announced on May 29, 2023, that “fuel subsidy is gone,” Nigerians have experienced one of the most dramatic shifts in the nation’s economic landscape. Fuel prices rose almost immediately, transportation costs soared, food prices skyrocketed, and the cost of living reached levels many households had never experienced before.

For some economists and policymakers, the removal of fuel subsidy was a bold and necessary decision. They argue that subsidy payments had become a huge financial burden on the government, consuming trillions of naira that could have been used to improve infrastructure, healthcare, education, and other critical sectors. They also point to years of corruption, fraudulent claims, and fuel smuggling that turned the subsidy regime into a system that benefited a few powerful individuals more than the average Nigerian.

On paper, these arguments appear convincing. A nation cannot continue spending beyond its means indefinitely. No economy can thrive when public funds are repeatedly drained by an inefficient system. The idea behind subsidy removal was to free up resources, attract investment, encourage competition, and ultimately create a stronger and more sustainable economy.

However, while the policy may make economic sense in theory, its practical consequences have raised an important question: Who is really bearing the burden of this reform?

READ ALSO: Fuel Subsidy Removal: A Necessary Reform, But Poorly Managed

The answer is becoming increasingly clear. The greatest burden is being carried not by politicians, oil marketers, or economic advisers, but by ordinary Nigerians whose daily lives have become significantly more difficult since the policy was introduced.

The first and most visible impact of subsidy removal was the sharp increase in fuel prices. Petrol, which once sold for less than ₦200 per litre, suddenly rose to over ₦500 and later climbed even higher. This increase did not affect fuel alone. Because transportation is the foundation upon which many economic activities depend, the rise in fuel prices triggered a chain reaction across virtually every sector of the economy.

Today, transport fares have become a major source of concern for millions of Nigerians. Workers who commute daily spend a significant portion of their salaries on transportation. Students traveling to and from school face higher costs. Traders transporting goods from farms and warehouses to urban markets pay more for logistics. Even short journeys that once seemed affordable have become expensive.

For many Nigerians, transportation costs have become a daily reminder of the economic hardship caused by subsidy removal.

The impact is particularly severe in the food sector. Farmers must pay more to transport produce from rural communities to urban markets. Food vendors and retailers pass these additional expenses on to consumers. The result is visible in every market across the country. The prices of rice, beans, yam, garri, vegetables, bread, and other staple foods have increased significantly.

Families that once managed to provide three meals a day now struggle to afford two. Parents are forced to reduce household expenses, often sacrificing nutritional quality in order to survive. The rising cost of food has become one of the most painful consequences of subsidy removal because it affects every Nigerian regardless of age, occupation, or social status.

READ ALSO: Fuel Price Hike Turns Basic Meals into Luxury for DELSU Students

Small businesses are also feeling the pressure. Across Nigeria, countless enterprises rely on petrol and diesel-powered generators because of the country’s unstable electricity supply. Barbers, welders, tailors, cybercafés, restaurants, and other small business owners now spend far more on energy than they did before.

For many entrepreneurs, profit margins have shrunk dramatically. Some have increased the prices of their goods and services to stay afloat, while others have reduced their workforce or shut down entirely. The consequences extend beyond business owners themselves. Employees lose jobs, families lose income, and communities lose economic opportunities.

In a country where small and medium-sized enterprises contribute significantly to employment and economic growth, the pressure on businesses represents a serious challenge to national development.

The education sector has not been spared either. Students in tertiary institutions face increasing financial difficulties due to higher transportation costs, rising accommodation fees, and more expensive food. Parents already struggling with inflation find it difficult to meet educational expenses.

Some students now combine their studies with multiple side jobs to support themselves. Others rely heavily on friends and relatives for assistance. In extreme cases, some students have been forced to suspend their education because their families can no longer afford the associated costs.

This situation raises concerns about the long-term impact of economic hardship on access to education and human capital development.

Healthcare has become another area affected by the ripple effects of subsidy removal. Hospitals and clinics face higher operational costs due to increased fuel and transportation expenses. The prices of medicines and medical supplies have also risen because of higher logistics costs and exchange rate challenges.

For low-income families, accessing quality healthcare has become increasingly difficult. Many postpone medical treatment, self-medicate, or avoid hospital visits altogether because of financial constraints. This creates a dangerous situation where economic hardship translates into poorer health outcomes for vulnerable citizens.

Despite these challenges, supporters of subsidy removal maintain that the policy should be judged by its long-term benefits rather than its immediate consequences. They argue that reforms of this magnitude are often painful at the beginning but necessary for sustainable growth. According to this view, the savings generated from subsidy removal can help fund infrastructure projects, reduce fiscal deficits, improve public services, and attract foreign investment.

Indeed, the government has introduced several measures intended to cushion the impact of the policy. These include conditional cash transfers, student loan programmes, wage awards, compressed natural gas initiatives, and infrastructure investments. Government officials have repeatedly assured Nigerians that the savings from subsidy removal are being redirected toward projects that will benefit the country in the future.

However, many citizens remain unconvinced.

The challenge is not simply whether government interventions exist. The challenge is whether those interventions are reaching enough people and whether they are sufficient to offset the hardship being experienced across the country. For many Nigerians, the promised benefits remain distant and difficult to see.

A worker struggling to pay transport fares, a mother unable to afford food for her children, or a student battling rising living expenses may find little comfort in promises of future economic gains. Economic reforms succeed when citizens can see tangible improvements in their quality of life. When hardship continues without visible relief, public confidence inevitably weakens.

Another important issue is transparency. Nigerians deserve clear and regular information about how subsidy savings are being utilized. Citizens should be able to see measurable improvements in roads, hospitals, schools, power supply, and public transportation systems. Transparency not only builds trust but also strengthens public support for difficult reforms.

If citizens are expected to make sacrifices, they must be confident that those sacrifices are producing meaningful results.

It is also important to recognize that fuel subsidy removal alone cannot solve Nigeria’s economic challenges. Other structural problems continue to affect the country’s development. Poor electricity supply, insecurity, inadequate infrastructure, unemployment, and currency instability all contribute to economic hardship.

Without addressing these broader issues, subsidy removal may simply transfer financial pressure from government accounts to the pockets of ordinary citizens.

This is why complementary reforms are essential. Investments in public transportation can reduce commuting costs. Stable electricity can lower business expenses. Increased local refining capacity can reduce dependence on imported petroleum products. Agricultural support programmes can improve food production and stabilize prices. Job creation initiatives can increase household incomes and strengthen economic resilience.

Such measures are necessary if the benefits of subsidy removal are to be widely shared.

As Nigerians continue to adjust to life after subsidy removal, one reality remains undeniable: the ordinary citizen is carrying the heaviest burden. The civil servant whose salary has remained unchanged, the trader struggling to restock goods, the farmer transporting produce, the student pursuing an education, and the small business owner fighting to survive all bear the weight of this economic reform every day.

READ ALSO: Grassroots Developments, Warri North LGA And The Hon. Ashima’s Magic Wand

This does not necessarily mean the policy was wrong. Economic reforms are often necessary and sometimes unavoidable. However, necessity does not eliminate responsibility. Government must ensure that the burden of reform is not borne disproportionately by those least able to afford it.

A successful economic policy should not only balance national accounts but also improve the welfare of citizens. Growth should be reflected not only in statistics and economic reports but also in the everyday experiences of ordinary people.

The debate over fuel subsidy removal is therefore no longer about whether the policy should have happened. It has already happened. The more pressing issue is whether the promised benefits will eventually justify the sacrifices being made today.

Until inflation falls significantly, transportation becomes more affordable, jobs become more available, electricity becomes more reliable, and living standards improve, many Nigerians will continue to ask a simple but powerful question:

If fuel subsidy removal was meant to rescue the economy, why does it feel as though ordinary Nigerians are the ones paying the highest price?

The answer to that question may ultimately determine how history judges one of the most significant economic reforms in modern Nigeria.

The author, Pius Ashima, is a-200 Level student of Journalism and Media Studies at Delta State University, Abraka. Email: ashimapius@gmail.com

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Education

Nigeria @ 66: 78 Borno Children Still In Captivity 139 Days After Abduction

Published

on

By Harrenta Brown

As Nigeria celebrates 66 years of independence today, 42 reportedly children taken from a school in Borno State have spent 139 days in captivity.

They were abducted on May 15th 2026 from Mussa Primary and Junior Secondary School in Borno State.

Six weeks later, on June 29, a second attack struck the same local government area.

Gunmen reportedly raided Government Day Secondary School in Lassa about 20 km from Mussa, killing a teacher who refused to go with them and abducting 36 students and one more teacher.

Gunmen struck two schools on May 15th in Oyo State and Borno State.

In Oyo, 39 children and seven teachers were abducted. l

The Oyo case became a viral topic and made news headlines within days, driven by outrage after one of the kidnapped teachers, Mr. Michael Oyedokun, was beheaded. Social media coverage was constant, and 56 days later, on July 10th, the surviving Oyo children and teachers were released.

Many Nigerians are shocked to learn for the first time that these children have been in captivity for that long.

Their shock is followed by a question: How did this happen without them knowing?

For most of the past four and a half months, most Nigerians had no idea they were still in captivity. Interviewed individuals’ reactions have ranged from disbelief to suspicion of a deliberate silence.

Kamsi and his friend Victor both believe the government’s silence is political, as they pointed to next year’s election, saying “the media isn’t talking about it because it reflects badly on the country and on the coming election”.

Judith had no idea the children were still missing.

“It’s evil and heartbreaking that these children are still in captivity while the government remains silent,” she said.

Enor reacted with the same shock, saying she had no idea and called for the government’s transparency, also urging officials to update citizens on the case so the children do not become forgotten the way the Chibok girls were. 

Another Nigerian who asked not to be named wondered why a country was celebrating its independence when it truly had no independent security forces.

He asked who was to be blamed and believes that the silence has a regional dimension.

He argued that Northern Nigeria receives less attention than the South, and that the case would have moved faster if influencers and politicians got involved the same way they did with the Oyo case. 

Tife, a corper, wondered why there were no press conferences and coverage on the matter, and why it wasn’t being treated with urgency.

She feared she could have been the one taken and forgotten.

The big questions Nigerians are asking now are not only where the children are, but why has the case not generated the same urgency as the Oyo State case?

They also questioned the celebration of independence as a country when children of the country are still in captivity.

Two kidnappings on the same day, but with two entirely different outcomes.

As of today, the two attacks combined have left 78 schoolchildren from the same corner of Borno State in captivity, 42 from Mussa, now at 139 days, and 36 from Lassa, now at 94 days.

Two kidnappings that happened 45 days apart in the same local government area and neither has produced a rescue.

Continue Reading

Politics

Nigeria @ 66: Tinubu Declares End of Emergency Reforms, Says Country Has Entered Age of Shared Prosperity

Published

on

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, Thursday, declared that Nigeria has passed the worst of its economic pains and has now entered the age of prosperity, in his 66th Independence Day address to the nation.

In an Independence Day celebration broadcast titled “From Reform to Prosperity”, the President said his administration chose to confront Nigeria’s deep economic distortions head-on when it assumed office in 2023, likening the country at that time to a cancer patient who must endure painful treatment to survive.

He said for too long Nigeria’s leaders chose morphine while praying for a miracle that never came, but his administration resolved to do things differently and excise the cancer.

Three and a half years after the removal of fuel subsidy and the foreign exchange reforms, Tinubu said the evidence of recovery is now undeniable.

He noted that the economy has grown by over four percent this year, with both oil and non-oil sectors contributing to stable growth, while oil theft has reduced and foreign direct investment continues to rise.

READ ALSO: Oborevwori, DELSU VC Hail Peretomode at Valedictory Lecture

According to him, inflation has fallen substantially from its peak, foreign reserves have been rebuilt and the foreign exchange market has stabilised.

He added that in 2025 the country recorded its highest revenue from non-oil exports in history, exceeding six billion dollars, which he described as real money being made by real Nigerian businesses.

These, he said, are not idle claims, as international observers, journalists, NGOs and multilateral institutions have all concluded that the reforms have strengthened Nigeria’s stability and resilience.

The President said that with the foundation now repaired, the central task of government has changed from correcting the economy to delivering shared and widespread prosperity.

He explained that prosperity to him does not mean merely larger numbers or better statistics, but a Nigeria where the farmer can cultivate safely and earn a decent return, where factories have reliable power, businesses can obtain credit, young people can find productive work, food and transportation are affordable, education is within reach, and families can look to the future with confidence.

To achieve this, Tinubu said his government will focus on bringing down the cost of living by lowering the cost of producing and moving goods.

He outlined plans to expand mechanised irrigation and dry-season farming, improve access to seeds and fertiliser, increase mechanisation, invest in storage and transportation, and build and complete roads, railways and ports that connect farms and factories to markets.

READ ALSO: Lawyers Advocate Speedy Justice For Litigants In Abraka Courts

His logic, he said, is simple: when farmers produce more cheaply, when fewer crops are lost between farm and market, when manufacturers spend less on electricity and trucks reach destinations faster in a competitive environment, those savings will ultimately reflect in market prices.

On jobs, the President said Nigeria’s youthful population must become an engine of production rather than a source of despair.

He pledged to use the nation’s gas to power new industries, support businesses to revive factories in industrial centres, expand digital connectivity into long-neglected communities, invest in relevant skills and provide infrastructure and finance for businesses to grow.

He said he wants to see more Nigerians making things, more farms feeding cities and supplying factories, more businesses selling Nigerian goods to the world, and young Nigerians building unicorns and creating opportunities at home.

Acknowledging that millions of citizens still struggle for daily meals, school fees and medical bills, the President said their plight is the accumulated consequence of decades of low productivity and weak institutions.

While this cannot be erased in four years, he said the course can be changed and the vulnerable will not be abandoned.

He pointed to strengthened direct support through an improved National Social Register for the poorest households, the Nigerian Education Loan Fund ensuring that children of low-income families can pursue higher education, and CREDICORP giving working Nigerians access to consumer credit for vehicles, solar systems and digital devices without years of savings.

He added that government has continued to pay salaries and pensions on time and in full, reformed the national pension programme, and is working with states and local governments to strengthen primary healthcare and basic education.

These programmes, he said, are not substitutes for prosperity but a bridge towards it, stressing that the objective is not to manage poverty more efficiently but to defeat it.

Tinubu urged Nigerians to resist calls by what he described as influential but regressive voices to abandon reforms and return to addictive subsidies, insisting that the nation must remember why the journey began.

He declared that the emergency treatment is over and the foundation has been repaired, saying Nigeria has corrected its course and passed through its own Red Sea.

While calling for unity and renewed faith, he said the promised land before the nation is one of abundance and opportunity where prosperity is broadly shared and every child can dream beyond the circumstances of birth.

He concluded that the destination is in sight, the foundations are strong and the direction is clear, urging Nigerians to go forward together with no looking back.

Continue Reading

Abraka Metro

Oborevwori, DELSU VC Hail Peretomode at Valedictory Lecture

Published

on

A former Vice-Chancellor of Delta State University, Abraka, Prof. Victor Peretomode, has proposed a tripartite governance model to sustain excellence in the institution.

Peretomode proposed the model at DELSU’s 12th valedictory lecture held on Thursday, September 24, 2026, at the university’s 750 Lecture Theatre, Site III.

The lecture was titled, “DELSU and the Burden of Expectation: The Challenges of Being Delta State’s Premier University and Rethinking Governance for Sustainable Excellence.”

He said as the state’s premier university, DELSU carries triple burdens — aspirational, political and operational — which translate into expectations such as expanding access to university education for Deltans, accommodating qualified indigenes, advancing state-specific development priorities and producing morally sound and employable graduates.

READ ALSO: DELSU Exam Monitors Apprehend Student With Allegedly Stolen Phones, Wig

Peretomode, a Professor of Educational Administration and Higher Education, said the challenges could be addressed through his proposed “Peretomode Tripartite Model of Governance for Sustainable Excellence,” anchored on three pillars: Leadership Integrity, Funding Predictability and Quality Assurance.

He observed that DELSU has come far, but its journey is far from complete, adding that the burden of expectation it carries is not a weight to be feared, but a responsibility to be fulfilled.

In his remarks, Governor Sheriff Oborevwori, Visitor to the university, described Peretomode as an academic who contributed immensely to the development of university education in the state.

Oborevwori, who was represented by the Commissioner for Higher Education, Prof. Nyerhovwo Tonukari, said the state would still need Peretomode’s wealth of experience as he bows out of service and assured of continued support for DELSU.

On his part, the Vice-Chancellor of DELSU, Prof. Samuel Asagba, lauded Peretomode’s achievements as former VC, noting that his policies, though considered harsh at the time, have placed the university in its present enviable state.

Asagba wished the valedictory lecturer the best in his future endeavours.

Highlights of the event included the launch of two books authored by the valedictory lecturer and a musical rendition by the Department of Music.

Peretomode joined DELSU in 1992 as Senior Lecturer in the Department of Educational Management and Foundations, became a Professor in 1996 and served as its 7th substantive Vice-Chancellor from 2014 to 2019.

The lecture was attended by the Vice-Chancellor of University of Delta, Agbor, Prof. Eric Eboh, Vice-Chancellor of Southern Delta University, Ozoro, Prof. Sunny Awhefeada, DELSU Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Administration), Prof. Edmund Atakpo, DELSU Deputy Vice Chancellor (Academic), Prof. Hilary Owamah, DELSU Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research and Innovation), Prof. Douglasson Omotor, Deputy Vice-Chancellor, University of Delta, Agbor, Prof. Patrick Ijeh, Provost of Oleh Campus, Prof. Augustine Atonuje, DELSU Registrar, Mrs Rufina Ufiofio, DELSU Bursar, Mrs Otimeyin Ekakitie-Omajuwa, DELSU Librarian, Dr Josephine Onohwakpor, Provosts, Deans, Directors, staff and students of the university.

Also in attendance were the Rector of Delta State Polytechnic, Otefe-Oghara, Prof. Emmanuel Ufuophu-Biri, Rector, Delta State Marine Polytechnic, Burutu, Prof. Emmanuel Okoro, Delta business tycoon, Chief Tunde Smooth, Executive Director of Project, DESOPADEC, Chief (Dr) Ebenezer Okorodudu, former DELSU Governing Council Chairman, Prof. Sam Oyovbaire, former Dennis Osadebey University Governing Council Chairman, Prof. Robert Ikomi, members of DELSU College of Chaplains, friends and family members of the valedictory lecturer, including his wife, Dr (Mrs) Otaroghene Peretomode.

Meanwhile, Delta State University, Abraka has released its approved UTME cut-off marks for the 2026/2027 admission session.

The release comes barely 24 hours after the state-owned institution released its first batch of admission for the incoming session.

Continue Reading

Trending